IEPadvocate4you

Carol Sadler
Special Education Consultant/Advocate
770-442-8357
1105 Rock Pointe Look
Woodstock, GA 30188
CarolSadler@bellsouth.net
www.IEPadvocate4you.com

I am a professional Parent Advocate assisting parents of disabled children in school meetings and helping them understand their rights under IDEA, 504, SST and ADA. I am a former CHADD and LDA Coordinator, and graduate of the GAO PLSP legal training course.

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Alert! Appeals Court Upholds Four Years of Compensatory Ed - Draper vs Atlanta Public Schools

 
FYI - Important case and award here in Atlanta for all children with Dyslexia who are not identified and remediated in our public school systems!  Have a similar case in Gwinnett that has been turned over to attorneys as well.  Perhaps when parents begin winning these large settlements for school districts harming their children, not teaching them to read, misdiagnosing as mentally retarded when they are severely language impaired and learning disabled, they will begin to implement truly scientific based remedial reading programs we have long been advocating for in our State!
 
Additional links to info on Draper vs Atlanta Public School System
 
 
 
Advocacy & Consulting Services - IEPadvocate4you
Carol Sadler, Special Education Consultant/Advocate
GA Advocacy Office PLSP I Graduate
770-442-8357
1105 Rock Pointe Look
Woodstock, GA 30188
CarolSadler@bellsouth.net
www.IEPadvocate4You.com
http://iepadvocate4you.blogspot.com
 
"There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequal people." ---- Thomas Jefferson
 
CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
Information contained in this communication is confidential and privileged. It is not meant to represent legal or medical advice, but rather advice given based on my knowledge as a trained Parent Advocate by the GA Advocacy Office, Council of Parent Advocates & Attorneys, CHADD, LDA, the GA DOE Parent Mentor program as an invited guest and the special education attorneys that I often work with on educational matters. Please do not forward without my permission.
 
 
Court rules in favor of student misdiagnosed as mentally disabled


Associated Press
Published on: 03/10/08

A federal appeals court has upheld a ruling that Atlanta Public Schools pay up to $152,000 to send a student long misdiagnosed as mentally disabled to a private school.

The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last week that the school system pay for Jarron Draper, now 21, to attend a school specializing in developmental disabilities for up to four years.

Draper was misdiagnosed with mental retardation by the school system in 1998, according to court records. His family fought for five years to have him retested. In 2003, an independent analysis showed he actually has dyslexia, a learning disability, but Draper's attorneys say the school system was slow to remove him from the restrictive class for mentally disabled students even after the new diagnosis.

"We're elated," said Draper's attorney David Monde about the appeals court decision. "What it means for him is that he is assured of having four years of private school education ... to try to compensate for the years of educational neglect that he suffered at hands of Atlanta Public Schools."

Atlanta Public Schools spokesman Joe Manguno issued a statement from administrators later that said the system "serves thousands of special education children every day, and every one of them is important to us.

"We acted in what we believe was the best interest of this student and his family, and will continue to do so. Furthermore, we fully intend to abide by the rulings of the courts," the statement said.

Draper, who was reading at a fourth-grade level when he was 17, has been moving from one minimum-wage job to another since he left Benjamin E. Mays High School three years ago, Monde said. Draper wants to finish high school and go on to college to study computer services, Monde said.

He plans to attend The Cottage School, a suburban Atlanta campus devoted to serving special-needs students, Monde said.

The appeals court's ruling affirms an order from U.S. District Court Judge Martin Shoob issued a year ago. In his court order, Shoob agreed with an administrative judge who had found in favor of Draper, saying it is "incredulous that anyone, let alone supposedly trained professionals, could have deemed JD mentally retarded as late as 2003."

A state law passed last year gives Georgia parents the option to apply for state-funded vouchers to send their children with mental, emotional or physical disabilities to private schools. The vouchers can be worth between $2,000 and $15,000 annually, depending on the child's disability.

Draper would not qualified for that assistance because he was not enrolled in a Georgia public school last year.

 
 
 
Subject: FW: Alert! Appeals Court Upholds Four Years of Compensatory Ed

Dear Carol Sadler, Subscribe Me!

Carol Sadler has forwarded this newsletter to you so that you can consider signing up for your own copy in the future.


 
Alert! Appeals Court Upholds Award of
Four Years of Compensatory Ed

Wrightslaw        Law      Advocacy     Training      Products      Store      Subscribe       Sitemap       Contact Us

March 10, 2008

ISSN: 1538-3202

Issue: 426
Subscribers: 58,760

In This Issue:

Prospective Compensatory Ed in a Private School

"Poor Man's Burlington Remedy" by Steve Wyner, Esq.

What is the Significance of Draper?

"A Lesser Spirit Would Have Been Crushed Years Ago"

Wrightslaw WebEx Training

New!
Understanding Your Child's
Test Scores

CD-ROM training Understanding Your Child's Test Scores

Learn More

Retail Price: $24.95
Intro Offer: $14.95

To Order

Special Education Law & Advocacy Training
(6.5 hrs)

Wrightslaw WebEx Special Education Law & Training Program (6.5 hrs)
Learn More


Retail Price: $99.95
Special Offer: $49.95

To Order

Wrightslaw Training

icon March 13: Dallas, TX
icon March 19: San Jose, CA
icon April 4-5: Portland, ME
icon April 17: Bridgewater, NJ
icon April 23: Detroit, MI
icon Full Schedule

Contact Info

Pete and Pam Wright
Wrightslaw & The Special Ed Advocate
P. O. Box 1008
Deltaville, VA 23043

Website

   

Copyright © 2008, Peter W. D. Wright and Pamela Darr Wright. All rights reserved. Please do NOT reprint or host on your website without explicit permission.

On March 20, 2007, the District Court of Georgia ordered the Atlanta Independent School System to pay Jarron Draper's tuition at a private special education school for four years, or until he graduated with a diploma from high school, as prospective compensatory education for their persistent failure to educate him.
Jarron Draper
The Judge ruled that
"Compensatory awards should compensate, and this means that they must do more than provide 'some benefit' as required by ordinary IEPs ..." Decision

The Atlanta Independent School System and Jarron appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to resolve different legal issues.

On March 6, 2008, the Court of Appeals unanimously upheld the decision of the District Court in Jarron Draper v. Atlanta Independent School System (11th Cir. 2008).

This Alert describes the case and how it will help other families and their attorneys negotiate better settlements with school districts. The Alert includes additional information about Jarron and the legal issues in these decisions.

Don't hesitate to forward this Alert to other families, friends, and colleagues.

forward to a friend

Sign up free today!  l Read previous issues


Prospective Compensatory Ed in a Private School

In Jarron Draper v. Atlanta Independent School District (N.D. GA 2007), the District Court held that:

"Compensatory education involves discretionary, prospective, injunctive relief crafted by a court to remedy what might be termed an educational deficit created by an educational agency's failure over a given period of time to provide a FAPE to a student ...

"Compensatory awards should compensate, and this means that they must do more than provide 'some benefit' as required by ordinary IEPs ... compensatory education is necessary to preserve a handicapped child's right to a free education."

The U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit upheld the District Court's award of compensatory education that required the school system to pay prospective educational services provided by a private school. The Court specifically rejected the notion that the student had to prove that the public school system was incapable of providing the compensatory education.

The Court relied on the Supreme Court decisions in Sch. Comm. of Burlington v. Dep't of Educ., 471 U.S. 359, 105 S.Ct. 1996 (1985) and Florence County Sch. Dist. Four v. Carter ex rel. Carter, 510 U.S. 7, 114 S.Ct. (1993), which held that school districts are required to reimburse parents for the costs of private placements in nonpublic schools when the public school failed to provide the child with an appropriate education.

Relying on these decisions, the Court reasoned that the District Court had the authority to require a public school to pay the cost of prospective compensatory education that would be provided by a private school.

back to the top


"Poor Man's Burlington Remedy"

The harsh reality is that most families cannot afford to remove their child from an inappropriate public school program and pay tuition for a private placement, while also incurring the expenses of a due process hearing and subsequent litigation.

In Draper, the 11th Circuit fashioned a "poor man's Burlington remedy" for these families:

"The Act does not relegate families who lack the resources to place their children unilaterally in private schools to shouldering the burden of proving that the public school cannot adequately educate their child before those parents can obtain a placement in a private school. The Act instead empowers the district court to use broad discretion to fashion appropriate relief."

Read more in Poor Man's Burlington Remedy by Steve Wyner, one of Jarron's attorneys.

back to the top


What is the Significance of Draper?

In an interview with Steve Wyner, we asked what he saw as the significance of the case. He mentioned three issues.

Tool to Negotiate for Quality Compensatory Services

He said, "this decision should help special needs families and their counsel in negotiating settlements that provide quality educational remediation when their child has been denied a free appropriate public education (FAPE)."

Accordiing to Wyner, "When the school system fails to provide FAPE, the family can and should ask for compensatory education from a non public agency or school."

"Public schools often offer to provide compensatory education in the form of supplemental educational services provided by their staff. Since the public school failed to provide FAPE previously, compensatory educational services provided in the future (prospectively) by school district staff is generally an ineffective remedy. The same teachers who previously failed to educate the child would be responsible for remediating their past failures."

Compensatory Education Requires More

"While the Supreme Court decision in Rowley requires school districts to provide special needs students with a "basic floor of opportunity" that provides "some educational benefit," the 11th Circuit held that compensatory awards must do more, and "should place children in the position that they would have been in but for the violation of the Act."

Simple Themes Win Cases: Teaching Children to Read

Simple themes win cases. In Jarron's case, the themes included the following: the school system failed to appropriately evaluate him, misdiagnosed him as mentally retarded when he had dyslexia, and failed to teach him to read.

If schools don't teach children the basic skills of reading, writing and math, these children will never have an opportunity to become productive, self sufficient members of society, which is the purpose of the IDEA.

Read the decisions from the U. S. District Court and the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. You will see this theme repeated over and over - that Jarron's reading skills were at the 3rd grade level, year after year after year, until he finally left school.

Read Steve Wyner's analysis of the significance of the case and how it may benefit you.

back to the top


"A Lesser Spirit Would Have Been Crushed Years Ago"

A Lesser Spirit Would Have Been Crushed Years Ago  is a more personal "inside story" of Jarron Draper's case.

When the Judge issued the favorable decision in 2007, Jarron was 20 years old. He couldn't read, earn a high school diploma, or fulfill his dream of attending college. He was stocking shelves at Target and working as a security guard.

In A Lesser Spirit, you'll learn about the battles his family fought, how school employees failed to fulfill their responsibilities, and who stepped up to the plate to represent him in the due process hearing.

You'll learn about legal issues - burden of proof, statute of limitations, and remedies for the failure to provide a child with a free appropriate education including compensatory education.

You'll meet the dedicated and talented attorneys who also stepped up to the plate to help Jarron and his family when their case went to federal court.

back to the top


 

What People Are Saying About The Special Ed Advocate Newsletter

"Thanks for the trustworthy information and support you provide through the Wrightslaw website and newsletter. You helped our family act when we needed to - we are thriving now."

 

Great Products From Wrightslaw

Wrightslaw: Special Education Law, 2nd Edition, by Pam and Pete Wright Wrightslaw: No Child Left Behind

Surviving Due Process: Stephen Jeffers v. School Board

About the Book
To Order
About Book
To Order
About Book
To Order
About DVD Video
To Order
 

Visit Wrightslaw.com


Wrightslaw · Pete & Pam Wright · P. O. Box 1008 · Deltaville · VA · 23043

Forward This Issue To A Friend

This email was forwarded to carolsadler@bellsouth.net, by Carol Sadler.
Privacy Policy.

Email Marketing by
Constant Contact

Sunday, February 03, 2008

Educational Records

Educational Records, On-Site Record Reviews, Record Requests, and Organizing Educational Records
by: Carol Sadler © 2008
 
Advocacy & Consulting Services - IEPadvocate4you
Carol Sadler, Special Education Consultant/Advocate
GA Advocacy Office PLSP I Graduate
770-442-8357
1105 Rock Pointe Look
Woodstock, GA  30188
CarolSadler@bellsouth.net
www.IEPadvocate4You.com
http://iepadvocate4you.blogspot.com/
 

 

EDUCATIONAL RECORDS,

RECORD REQUESTS, ON-SITE RECORD REVIEWS,

and ORGANIZING EDUCATIONAL RECORDS

 

Laws that apply to Educational Records:

FERPA http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/index.html

Parents or eligible students have the right to inspect and review the student's education records maintained by the school. Schools are not required to provide copies of records unless, for reasons such as great distance, it is impossible for parents or eligible students to review the records. Schools may charge a fee for copies.

IDEA (Regulations based on IDEA 1997)

34 CFR 300.562 Access rights.  http://www.cec.sped.org/law_res/doc/law/regulations/regs/SubpartE.php#sec300.562
(a) Each participating agency shall permit parents to inspect and review any education records relating to their children that are collected, maintained, or used by the agency under this part. The agency shall comply with a request without unnecessary delay and before any meeting regarding an IEP, or any hearing pursuant to §§ 300.507 and 300.521-300.528, and in no case more than 45 days after the request has been made.

 

GA Special Education Rules and Regulations (Regulations based on IDEA 1997) http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-7-.05.pdf

160-4-7-.05 Procedural Safeguards/Parent’s Rights.

(1)   General

( c ) Each local school system and state-operated program (LSS/SOP) shall establish and maintain procedures to provide an opportunity for the parent(s)/guardian(s)/surrogate(s) of a student with a disability to:

1.      Examine and obtain copies of all records relating to such student.

 

 

What constitutes an Education Record?

GA Special Education Rules and Regulations - Parental Opportunity To Examine Records http://public.doe.k12.ga.us/_documents/doe/legalservices/160-4-7-.09.pdf

   “opportunity to inspect and review any educational records relating to their children that are collected, maintained, or used in the identification, evaluation, educational placement, and the provision of FAPE.”

 

Wrightlaw – Glossary of Special Education and Legal Terms

http://www.wrightslaw.com/links/glossary.sped.legal.htm

   Education records. All records about the student that are maintained by an educational agency or institution; includes instructional materials, teacher’s manuals, films, tapes, test materials and protocols.”

 

Wrightlaw – FERPA

http://www.fetaweb.com/04/ferpa.summary.htm

   those records, files, documents, and other materials, which (i) contain information directly related to a student; and (ii) are maintained by an educational agency or institution or by a person acting for such agency or institution. 20 U.S.C. §1232g(a)(4)(A). See also 34 CFR §99.3. 

Education records include “all instructional materials, including teacher’s manuals, films, tapes, or other supplementary material which will be used in connection with any survey, analysis, or evaluation as part of any applicable program shall be available for inspection by the parents or guardians of the children. 

The transcript of a hearing is an education record for purposes of Section 504. Due process decisions are education records. Tapes of IEP meetings are education records as are IEPs. Letters between parent and school are education records. 

Personal notes and memory aids that are used only by the person who made them are not educational records. But if notes are shared with or disclosed to another person, notes are educational records.”

 

Wrightlaw – FERPA Memorandum:  Access to Test Protocols and Test Answer Sheets

http://www.fetaweb.com/04/ferpa.rooker.ltr.protocols.htm

   “Completed test instruments or question booklets containing information that identify a particular student, whether or not the name of the student appears on the booklet, constitute “education records” subject to the FERPA requirements.” 

“Because answer sheets are usually directly related to a student, they generally fall within the definition of education records to which a parent has the right to inspect and review.” 

NASP (National Association of School Psychologist – Test Protocols and Parents Rights – To Copies?

http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/cq341protocols.aspx

 

NASP (National Association of School Psychologist – Copying Protocols To Parents

 http://www.nasponline.org/publications/cq/cq311protocols.aspx

   As previously reported, FERPA, IDEA and Section 504 all require that parents be given access to school records (including test protocols), and that this access is limited to a review of records unless the records can not be provided for review within 45 days. 

Further, parents may request that actual copies of records be released to appropriate third parties (such as community mental health providers). FERPA includes an additional provision neglected in our earlier analysis: Once the parent has formally requested release of school records to a third party, the parent is then entitled to copies of the same records. In other words, once schools have released copies of protocols to a third party at the parents' request, the parent may request and receive copies as well.”

 

Ed.Gov – Letter to Carroll County Independent School District

http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/fpco/ferpa/library/carrollisd091305.html

   As explained in our October 2, 1997, letter, referenced above, test instruments, question booklets, answer sheets, evaluations, surveys, inventories, and other materials that identify a student (by name or number) and that are maintained by the District - or by a party acting for the District, such as a psychologist conducting an FIE - are "education records" under this definition.”

 

Carol’s Advice on Record Requests and On-Site Record Reviews:

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) supports IDEA and states that parents have the right to inspect their child’s records.  The Georgia Special Education Rules and Regulations go further and state that parents have the right to obtain copies.  IDEA states the records must be provided without unnecessary delay, prior to an IEP meeting, not more than 45 days, and if necessary to provide FAPE they must be free. 

Georgia schools are required to provide “one” free copy of all educational records to parents.  Often when parents make a blanket record request, school districts threaten to charge a fee, which they can do after providing “one” free copy.  They will maintain that copies have been previously provided in IEP meetings, thereby justifying charging a fee.

Therefore I typically recommend that parents do an On-Site Record Review instead of a blanket written records request.  Go in and inspect the educational files maintained on your child to make sure you have received a full and complete copy of every record.  Sometimes this request alone will prompt the LEA to provide a full (free) copy, as they would rather give parents a copy of their records than have parents come in and review the records in person.  However, parents really should do both, because you never what may be inadvertently left out or covered up if you allow the school to make copies for you, and you just might miss that smoking gun document to make your case.

When one goes to a school to complete an on-site record review:

1)      Make an appointment with the Principal through e-mail documenting your request (see sample letter below);

2)      Go in, be nice and polite;

3)      Expect to be monitored, they will have someone sitting with you;

4)      Specifically ask if you have “all” folders and records maintained on the student to review;

5)      Review all records making sure you have “ALL” educational records including teacher files, special education records, general education records, records held at the county, therapy notes, e-mails, etc.;

6)      Keep their records neat and in the same order;

7)      Turn records you do not have sideways;

8)      Document on a note pad what you find;

9)      Count and document on notepad how many records (pages) they need to copy before you leave;

10)  Give the records and tell them you have documented the records you do not have a copy of and ask them to provide you your one free copy of each record;

11)  Follow up with an e-mail thanking them for allowing you to review the records.  Reiterate your request for necessary copies; document how many records were needed and state that you had not been previously provided a free copy of those records;

12)  Be patient to a point.  Give them time to make copies of the records.  However, if they are needed for an upcoming IEP meeting, document that according to State Regulations you must receive a copy prior to your IEP meeting on __ date.

 

Have fun.  It’s always interesting to see what is in the child’s file that you have never seen before and who within the system has reviewed your records.  They may contain interesting e-mail, interesting and telling teacher/therapist/administration notes and comments, mistakes, hidden documents, informal testing you didn’t know they had given the student, data collection you were not aware they were maintaining, writing samples parents had never seen, and sometimes even those “smoking gun” documents that makes your case.


Organize Educational Records

 

Now that you or the family you are assisting have completed the record request, it is important that the records are organized in a manner to make them an effective advocacy tool.  I typically recommend dividing a 3-inch notebook into 6 categories, which I listed below.  Put all records in chronological order with most recent on top.  Put a divider between each year in each section.

It is also important to keep a duplicate copy of records in separate place, and handy to make a quick copy for attorneys/advocates, private professionals or hearing notebooks. This way the family will always have a complete copy for multiple uses and quick copying as necessary.

Notebook Sections:

1) IEP's, SST's, 504's, BIP’s (Behavior Intervention Plans) meeting notices, Parent Request Letters, communication/e-mails to and from school district, Discipline reports/documents, Tribunal notices, etc.

2) Formal Testing (school and private evaluations) – Psychoeducational Evaluations, Psychological Reports, Neuropsychological Reports, Occupational Therapy Evals, Physical Therapy Evals, Central Auditory Processing Evals, Speech/Lang Evaluations, Vision/Hearing Evaluations, Functional Behavior Assessments, AT Evals, etc.

3) Report Cards, Progress Reports, Informal testing – most schools usually have a form of testing they use to measure a students progress in reading and math (i.e. – Accelerated Reader/STAR Diagnostic Reports, Success Maker Student Summery Reports Math/Reading, Timed Reading Evals, Lexia Reports, CCC Reports, etc.), Standardized Tests (ITBS, CRCT, IOWA, COGAT, Writing Tests, SAT, ACT, GGHST, etc), and IEP Goal updates. It's helpful if these groups are subdivided, separated with a divider, and grouped together by category of testing and put in chronological order with the most recent on top.  This way it is easy to make quick caparisons from year to year.

4) Work samples, informal teacher notes/e-mails, daily behavior sheets, tutoring updates, therapy notes, etc.

5) Due Process & State Complaint Records

6) Misc.- Bills, Draft IEP's, your notes and records, records of phone conversations

7) Optional - Medical Records (add if you like or make a separate notebook)

It is important that parents be able to flip to your information quickly and that they have it handy at every school meeting. This way, when the school says they didn't receive a document, you can give them another copy or quickly dispute what they have stated or implied. I can't tell you how important it is to be organized and prepared in your meetings. Make time to do this; don't wait until the last minute. Do a little at a time. Keep a 3-hole punch available and put school records in one place.  Organize as they come in.

Once the student is older and the notebook is too large, it is best to apply this same concept above, but have one notebook for just the current two years information. Every third year, pull out the previous year's info and put in the older notebook (which should be easy to do if you have used sub-dividers by year).

 

WHAT TO DO WITH ALL THAT CLASSWORK THAT COMES HOME?

I recommend that you keep an expandable 3-inch folder to accumulate your child's daily schoolwork. Label it and date it. Keep one for each year. Keep everything; you never know what a family might need. Keep artwork, drawings, writing assignments, tests, letters from teachers and all schoolwork returned. Keep it in chronological order with most recent in front; just keep adding to the front as it comes in. Copy and put only a FEW work samples in your Educational Folder.  Take this folder to every IEP meeting as well. 

I kept this folder on both my children who are 3 years apart.  When my 2nd child began to have problems in school due to Dyslexia and Dysgraphia, I was able to go back and compare her schoolwork to her sisters during the same grade. Being in the same school, with the same teachers, they did the same classwork and projects. It was very interesting to see how different they were, yet similar in of their disability area struggles. I was able to compare handwriting, drawings, writing assignments, and even daily class work, tests and grades. When I filed due process, it gave me a record of another child in the same grade (even though it was her sister it was very useful), and I was able to show my 2nd daughter's very impaired handwriting and written expression skills compared to another child's of the same age (and that was even compared to another child with a disability also). So it was great handy evidence!!

Additionally, both my children will have their school work to show their children when they get older.  Since many of the disabilities that they each have are genetic, it will be very likely they will have children with similar disabilities.  They may very well need some of these records to help with their children.


Sample Record Request Letter

 

Date

Your Address

Your City, State & Zip

Your Telephone

 

Principal Name, Principal

School Name

School Address

School City, State & Zip

 

Dear Mr. Principal Name,

We are the parents of your child’s name, birth date, who is currently enrolled in the So & So Program/Grade at School Name.

We are requesting a copy of all educational records for our child per 34 CFR 300.562. This request extends to all educational records maintained by the district, including but not limited to the following:

                  1.              Psychological evaluations and reports including standard scores, percentile rankings, grade and age equivalent scores and recommendations and observations.

 

                  2.                    Cumulative educational records.

 

                  3.                    Progress reports and report cards, grades and comments.

 

                  4.  Group and individual achievement and ability tests, statewide/district assessments, Occupational                         Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Speech Language evaluations, and psychoeducational reports                         with grade and age equivalents; standard scores; raw scores; percentile ranks; observations;                             and recommendations.

 

                  5.                    Disciplinary records and reports.

 

                  6.                    Attendance records.

 

                 7.     Case conference summaries and minutes, SST meetings and minutes, 504 Plan and minutes, and/or IEP's including goals, objectives and minutes.

 

                 8.                 Functional behavioral assessments and behavior intervention plans.

 

                 9.                 Medical records.

 

10.  Anecdotal notes and e-mails maintained by teachers (including general and special education teachers), school psychologists, counselors, administrators, or any other school system staff.

 

11.  Prior written notices.

 

12.  Collected work samples.

 

13.  Data Collection.

 

14.  Informal testing.

 

15.  All e-mail pertaining to student.

Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Please let us know when these records will be available and we will be happy to come by and pick them up.  We will also be willing to volunteer to come and make copies for you if necessary to expedite this matter (schools do not generally take parents up on this offer, but I like to add it to show parents willingness to help – now be sure to erase this sentence from your draft letter).

(Add if you have an upcoming IEP meeting) – We have an IEP meeting scheduled on (date).  Please provide records in advance of this meeting as required by IDEA 34 CFR 300.562 and the GA Special Education Rules and Regulations 160-4-7-.05.

Place a copy of this request in our child’s school file.

Sincerely,

  

Mr. & Mrs. Your Name

Parents 

cc  Special Ed. Lead Teacher and/or Counselor (who ever is working on your child’s case)

     Special Ed. Administrator, Supervisor, and/or Director (optional)

 

 

Sample On-Site Record Review Letter

 

Date

Your Address

Your City, State & Zip

Your Telephone

 

Principal Name, Principal

School Name

School Address

School City, State & Zip

 

Dear Mr. Principal Name,

We are the parents of your child’s name, birth date, who is currently enrolled in the So & So Program/Grade at School Name.

We are requesting an appointment to review all educational records for our child per 34 CFR 300.562. This request extends to all educational records maintained by the district, including but not limited to the following:

                  1.              Psychological evaluations and reports including standard scores, percentile rankings, grade and age equivalent scores and recommendations and observations.

 

                  2.                    Cumulative educational records.

 

                  3.                    Progress reports and report cards, grades and comments.

 

                  4.  Group and individual achievement and ability tests, statewide/district assessments, Occupational                         Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Speech Language evaluations, and psychoeducational reports                         with grade and age equivalents; standard scores; raw scores; percentile ranks; observations;                             and recommendations.

 

                  5.                    Disciplinary records and reports.

 

                  6.                    Attendance records.

 

                 7.     Case conference summaries and minutes, SST meetings and minutes, 504 Plans and minutes, and/or IEP's including goals, objectives and minutes.

 

                 8.                 Functional behavioral assessments (FBA) and behavior intervention plans (BIP).

 

                 9.                 Medical records.

 

16.  Anecdotal notes and e-mails maintained by teachers (including general and special education teachers), school psychologists, counselors, administrators, or any other school system staff.

 

17.  Prior written notices.

 

18.  Collected work samples.

 

19.  Data Collection.

 

20.  Informal testing.

 

21.  All e-mail pertaining to student.

 

22.  All previous testing protocols.

 

Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. Please let us know when it will be convenient for your staff.  We request that these records be gathered and available all in one location for our review. 

(Add if you have an upcoming IEP meeting) – We have an IEP meeting scheduled on (date).  We will need an appointment prior to this meeting as required by IDEA 34 CFR 300.562 and the GA Special Education Rules and Regulations 160-4-7-.05.

Please place a copy of this request in our child’s school file 

Sincerely,

 

 Mr. & Mrs. Your Name

Parents

cc  Special Ed. Lead Teacher and/or Counselor (who ever is working on your child’s case)

     Special Ed. Administrator, Supervisor, and/or Director (optional)

 

 

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

KidsEnabled Magazine Article on Parent Advocacy

Fall 06 Article

http://www.kidsenabled.com/articles/features/parentadvocacy.html

Parent Advocacy
By Maggie Parry

Sometimes fighting for your child’s educational rights can be an overwhelming and lonely task. But parent advocates, an underutilized resource, can help guide and ultimately empower parents of children with learning differences.

Mother Hugging SonWhen Heidi Fernandez’s son, Andrew, was diagnosed with autism, she knew he would need an individualized set of educational supports and services to ensure he reached his learning po­tential. But as she sat through her first round of individualized education pro­gram (IEP) meetings, she realized those supports were about as easily attained as a winning lottery ticket. She discov­ered that, because educators didn’t ful­ly understand Andrew’s atypical learn­ing style, they were less than willing to make changes in the classroom. She felt discouraged in her lack of knowl­edge regarding special education law and how to negotiate within the school system. Instead of the IEP meetings moving Andrew’s goals forward, they ended in stalemates because of fund­ing disputes, school policy confusion or staffing issues. Fernandez realized that if she was going to speak effec­tively on Andrew’s behalf, she would need crucial information and support. Desperate to obtain the tools Andrew needed for school success, and armed with the belief that “knowledge is power,” Fernandez turned to a parent advocate.

A parent advocate acts as “coach” to provide the information and training necessary to empower parents to ad­vocate for their children in a school set­ting. Once Fernandez enlisted the help of a parent advocate, she began to see a change in the outcome of Andrew’s IEP meetings. Her advocate helped her develop negotiating skills and function as a learning resource for teachers re­garding Andrew’s specific learning dif­ferences. When seeking a functional behavioral program for Andrew’s IEP, Fernandez used her newfound skills to successfully push for a timely and correctly executed assessment. This resulted in a realistic plan of tar­geted positive behaviors and rein­forcements to facilitate Andrew’s success during the school day. “As I became more knowledgeable,” Fernandez says, “I gained a strong voice and power in those meetings. I had more confidence to assert my­self for Andrew and his needs.”

Fernandez’s story reflects the experi­ence of many parents who seek sup­port services for their exceptional or challenged learners. Parents play a crucial role in making the decisions that shape a child’s academic suc­cess. For parents of children strug­gling with learning differences, that role exponentially intensifies as classroom and individualized sup­ports become mandatory for effec­tive learning. Parents might know their children better than anyone else, but when faced with the com­plexity of education law, school pol­icies and over-worked educators, they find themselves lacking critical tools necessary for speaking on be­half of their kids. They can become
Overwhelmed by what they do not know and consequently feel they have no effective voice in meet­ings or the power to help develop an effective plan for their children. Parents often don’t have the time or emotional energy to research the in­formation that advocates can bring to the table.

Like Fernandez, Carol Sadler felt the school system was not hearing her concerns adequately. Her daugh­ters, Christina and Angela, both diagnosed with multiple neurologi­cal disabilities, struggled in reading and math. They were not progress­ing, and Sadler could not get the proper supports in place to ensure their learning success. After seeking the advice of multiple professionals outside the school system with min­imal results, Sadler sought the help of a parent advocate. She became well-trained in negotiating skills, knowledgeable about her daugh­ters’ rights under the law and con­fident in her own ability to run an IEP meeting where her child’s needs remained at the forefront. Her expe­rience opened her eyes to the greatneed in the school community for advo­cates to help train and guide parents. Af­ter serving as coordinator for the Learn­ing Disabilities Association of Georgia for four years, Sadler underwent parent advocacy training through the Georgia Advocacy Office’s Parent Leadership Support Project and began advocating for other parents in her community. One of her priorities as a parent advocate is to understand the child’s learning difference and how that affects not only academic goals, but social, emotional and behav­ioral issues as well. She works closely with parents to teach the skills necessary to navigate meetings and obtain the nec­essary services and supports.

Claire Dees is also a parent advocate and president of Spectrum, Gwinnett Coun­ty Autism Support Group. She focuses on helping teachers and parents work as a team. Her advocacy goals include teaching parents how to be a resource for teachers. “The reality is that parents have to train teachers regarding their exceptional children,” she states. “Both parties need to think outside the box if academic goals will be met. If teachers consistently see parents as ad­versarial, and parents perceive teachers only as unyielding, then academic goals get lost in the impasse and the child loses the most.” Dees’ advocacy ser­vices include conducting parent/ teacher seminars, which teach communication and negotiation skills, as well as effective ways to share resources and ideas.

Services Offered by Parent Advocates